Seven contrasted case studies are presented in this study (Table 1) to demonstrate the application of the DEXi-Dairy tool. These case studies represented a wide range of climatic conditions (average temperatures between 3 and 12 °C, and annual precipitations from 490 up to 1614 mm), herd size (from 24 to 185 dairy cows), and length of grazing season (from 0 to 259 days). As for the grassland area, it varied from 38.8 to 100% of the total utilized agricultural area (UAA). A description of selected farms is provided in Table 4 and is completed in Balaine et al. (2023). They were located in the North (FR01) and South-East (FR02) for the French case studies, in the North-West (DE01) and North-East (DE02) for the German case studies, in the South (IR01) and West (IR02) for the Irish case studies, and finally in the Nordland region (NO01) for the Norwegian case study. At the time of the study, the main farm owners were men in six out of seven case studies. Farmers were aged 37 to 69, mostly with formal agricultural education (six out of seven farms). In two cases, the main farm holder had an off-farm job or received a pension.
Seven case study characteristics are presented in Table 1.
The environmental sustainability of 7 farms as evaluated based on DEXi method is presented in Table 2. Table 3 presents the economic sustainability of 7 farms as evaluated based on the DEXi method.
And, Table 4 presents the social sustainability of the seven dairy cattle farming systems as evaluated based on the DEXi method.
The sustainability tree and the weights of the sustainability indicators are illustrated in Figure 1.
Finally, the aggregated results of the general sustainability of the seven dairy farms are presented in Figure 2.
FR01
FR02
DE01
DE02
IR01
IR02
NO01
Mean temperature in 2020 (°C)
12.14
11.2
11.1
11.02
10.26
9.86
3.05
Max temperature in 2020 (°C)
16.15
16.36
15.42
15.52
13.51
13.65
5.86
Min temperature in 2020 (°C)
8.2
6.08
6.83
6.58
7.06
6.12
0.25
Total precipitation in 2020 (mm)
752.83
753.19
673.81
493.64
1493.93
1116.5
1614.79
Utilized agricultural area (UAA) (ha)
103.5
161
71
230
89
87
30
Dairy herd size (cows)
75
73
138
110
125
185
24
Total livestock units (LU)
130.5
124.2
182.6
125.8
179.5
234.5
38.7
Farm stocking rate (LU.ha−1)
1.26
0.77
2.57
0.55
2.02
2.70
1.29
Percentage of cropland to UAA (%)
61.2
5.4
45.1
28.6
0
0
0
Percentage of grassland to UAA (%)
38.8
94.6
54.9
71.7
100
100
90
Mineral nitrogen (N) on cropland (kg N.ha−1)
118.2
12.2
32.9
0
–
–
–
Organic N on cropland (kg N.ha−1)
36.8
115.7
48.2
25.8
–
–
–
Mineral N on grassland (kg N.ha−1)
156.6
6.9
42.3
0
58.1
42.8
109.3
Organic N on grassland (kg N.ha−1)
35.0
32.6
13.3
30.0
59.4
156.3
325.0
Milk yield per cow (l.cow⁻¹)
9567
5433
10,870
7127
6012
5362
7833
Additional farming enterprise(s)
B
A
–
A
B and CF
–
B and CF
Length of calving season (weeks)
40
52
52
52
13
11
52
Length of grazing season, dairy cows (days)
61
206
0
43
239
259
91
Organic farming (Y/N)
N
N
N
O
N
N
N
Case Studies
Attributes
FR01
FR02
DE01
DE02
IR01
IR02
NO01
Environmental sustainability1
Medium
Medium
Medium to High
Medium
Medium to High
Medium to High
Low to medium
Adopting best dairy herd management practices 2
Medium
Low
High
Medium
Medium
High
High
Feed Efficiency – Feed to Animal Product
Low to Medium
Low
High
Low to Medium
Low to Medium
Low to Medium
Medium to High
Enhance Circular Feed Supply
Medium to High
Medium to High
Low to Medium
Medium to High
Medium to High
Medium to High
Low to Medium
Local Production
High
High
Medium to High
High
High
High
Medium to High
Concentrate-to-Forage Ratio
Medium to High
Low
Medium to Low
Medium to Low
Medium to Low
Low
Medium to Low
By-Products Used in Diet
High
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Reducing Unproductive Cattle
Medium to Low
Medium to High
Medium to Low
Medium to High
Medium to Low
Low
Low
Age at First Calving
Medium to High
High
Medium to Low
Medium to Low
Low
Low
Low
Calving Interval
Medium to Low
Medium to Low
Medium to Low
Medium to High
Medium to Low
Low
Low
Environmental quality2
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
Very Low
Water quality3
Medium to Low
Low
Medium to High
Medium to Low
Medium to High
Medium to High
Low
Eutrophication potential3
Medium to High
High
Medium to Low
Medium to High
Medium to Low
Medium to Low
High
Contribution to climate change3
High
High
Medium to Low
High
Medium to High
Medium to High
High
Global warming potential3
High
High
Medium to Low
High
Medium to High
Medium to High
High
Air Quality2
Medium
Medium
Very high
High
Very high
Very high
Very low
Air acidification2
Medium
Medium
Very high
High
Very high
Very high
Very low
Soil quality3
Medium to High
High
Medium to High
High
High
High
Low to medium
Erosion risk2
Low
Very low
Low
Very low
Very low
Very low
Very high
Heavy metal balance4
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Abiotic resources conservation2
Medium
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Reducing water use3
Medium to High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Water use for animal housing3
Medium to Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
% of cultivated area irrigated3
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
Reducing energy use3
Low to medium
Low to medium
Low to medium
Low to medium
Low to medium
Medium to high
Low
Total energy consumption2
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Very Low
Very High
Farm energy production in the total energy us2
Very low
Very low
Very low
Very low
Very low
Very low
Very low
Biodiversity conservation2
Low
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Animal breeds and crop biodiversity3
Medium to high
Low to medium
Low to medium
Low to medium
Low
Low
Low
Number of different breeds3
Low to medium
Low to medium
Low
Low
Low to medium
Low
Low to medium
Number of different cultivated species3
High
Low to medium
Low to medium
Medium to high
Low
Low
Low
Reducing pesticide use3
Low to medium
Medium to high
Medium to high
High
High
High
Low to medium
Total treatment frequency index3
Medium
Low
Low
None
None
None
Low
Acute toxicity 2
High
Medium
Medium
Very low
Very low
Very low
Very high
Agroecosystem Biodiversity3
Low
Medium to high
Low
Low to medium
Low
Low
Medium to high
Habitat diversity4
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Low
High
Grassland management4
Low
High
Low
High
Low
Low
Low
Participation in agri-environmental scheme5
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
N for Nitrogen
1 Seven-classes qualitative scale: very low, low, low to medium, medium, medium to high, high, very high
2 Five-classes qualitative scale: very low; low, medium; high; very high
3 Four-classes qualitative scale: low, low to medium, medium to high, high
4 Three-classes qualitative scale: low, medium, high
5 Two-classes qualitative scale: low, high
Case Studies
Attributes
FR01
FR02
DE01
DE02
IR01
IR02
NO01
Economic sustainability1
Medium to high
Medium
Medium to high
Medium to high
Medium to high
Medium to high
Medium
Profitability2
Medium
Medium
High
High
High
High
Medium
Economic return3
Medium to high
Low to medium
Medium to high
High
Medium to high
High
Low to medium
Farm gross output per unpaid labour input3
Medium to high
Low to medium
Medium to high
High
Medium to high
High
Low to medium
Profit3
Medium to high
Medium to high
High
High
High
High
Low to medium
Farm gross margin per unpaid labour input3
Medium to high
Medium to high
High
High
High
High
Low to medium
Farm income3
Low to medium
Medium to high
Low to medium
Medium to high
High
Medium to high
Low to medium
Farm net income (before depreciation) per unpaid labour input3
Low to medium
Medium to high
Low to medium
Medium to high
High
Medium to high
Low to medium
Dairy product sales3
High
Low to medium
High
High
Low to medium
Low to medium
High
Dairy product sales per dairy cow3
High
Low to medium
High
High
Low to medium
Low to medium
High
Resilience2
High
Low
High
Low
High
High
Low
Dependence on the market rather than subsidies3
Medium to high
Low
High
High
High
High
Low
Market orientation3
Medium to high
Low
High
High
High
High
Low
Pressure of debts3
Medium to high
High
Medium to low
High
Medium to high
Low
High
Loan repayments per farm gross margin3
Medium to high
High
Medium to low
High
Medium to high
Low
High
Degree of specialization in dairy production3
High
Medium to high
Low to medium
Low
High
Low
High
Dairy gross output in the farm gross output3
High
Medium to high
Low to medium
Low
High
Low
High
Efficiency2
Very high
Medium
High
High
High
Medium
High
Cost efficiency3
Medium to high
High
Medium to high
High
High
Medium to high
Low to medium
Direct production costs per farm gross output3
Medium to high
High
High
High
High
High
Low to medium
Direct production costs per utilised agricultural area3
Low to medium
High
Low
High
Medium to high
Low to medium
Low
Labour efficiency3
High
Medium to high
Medium to high
Medium to high
High
High
Medium to high
Labour input per farm gross output3
High
Medium to high
High
Medium to high
High
High
Medium to high
Labour input per utilised agricultural area3
High
High
Low to medium
High
High
Medium to High
Low to medium
Partial productivity3
High
Low
High
Low to medium
Low to medium
Low
High
1-Seven classes qualitative scale: very low, low, low to medium, medium, medium to high, high, very high.
2Five-classes qualitative scale: very low; low, medium; high; very high.
3Four-classes qualitative scale: low, low to medium, medium to high, high
Case Studies
Attributes
FR01
FR02
DE01
DE02
IR01
IR02
NO01
Social sustainability1
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium to high
Medium
High
Very low
Sustainability of farm work2
Medium to low
Medium to high
Medium to high
Medium to high
Medium to low
High
Low
Physiological and security needs3
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Low
Social needs3
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
High
Medium
Esteem and self-actualisation needs3
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Sustainability of life outside of farming2
Medium to high
Medium to low
Medium to low
Medium to high
Medium to high
Medium to high
Low
Physiological and security3
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
Low
Social needs3
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Esteem and self-actualisation needs3
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
1Seven-classes qualitative scale: very low, low, low to medium, medium, medium to high, high, very high.
2Four-classes qualitative scale: low, low to medium, medium to high, high
3Three-classes qualitative scale: low, medium, high
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read MoreACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.